Why AG Mosaic
Evidence you can defend, at a cost you can predict.
A proprietary method, an evidence-first QA gate and a decision stack — compared honestly with the alternatives.
Why AG Mosaic
Built to be defended, not just read.
Proprietary method
A structured research method with fixed modules, scoring rubrics and templates.
Consistent results, not ad-hoc prompts.
Evidence-first QA
Every material claim carries an evidence ID and a citation; unsupported claims are removed or flagged.
Three outcomes only: approved, approved with limitations, not deliverable.
Decision stack, not a document
Report, spreadsheet, brief and figures from one structured source.
Always consistent across formats.
Traceability & audit trail
Sources, versions and limitations recorded per order.
Reproducible by design.
Predictable cost
Fixed plans with monthly research quotas.
No surprise hourly billing.
Security & privacy by design
Private storage, signed links, role-based access, row-level security.
Public sources only.
To our knowledge, AG Mosaic is the only platform that delivers this combination as one structured decision stack.
How it works
From question to decision stack in four steps.
Choose the decision & target
Pick one of eight decisions and name the company or market.
AG Mosaic plans and collects
The method plans the research and collects public evidence.
Every material claim is verified
A QA gate checks each claim against a cited source.
Receive the full stack
Editable formats, with limitations stated plainly.
Compare by category
How AG Mosaic compares to the usual options.
| AG Mosaic | Generic AI assistants | Search & data subscriptions | Traditional consultancies | In-house analyst team | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured multi-format deliverables | Yes | No | No | Partial | Partial |
| Every claim cited and verified | Yes | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial |
| Consistent method across reports | Yes | No | Partial | Partial | Partial |
| Editable Word + Excel + brief | Yes | Partial | No | Yes | Yes |
| Turnaround | Hours (target) | Minutes, unverified | Self-serve | Weeks | Weeks |
| Cost predictability | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Partial |
| Audit trail | Yes | No | Partial | Partial | Partial |
| Needs your own analysts to assemble | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Category generalizations as of Oct 2026; capabilities vary by provider. Not a statement about any specific company.
The squad you don't have to hire
The same decision-grade report: a 7-role squad vs. AG Mosaic.
7-role squad
78 hours
US$4,813
loaded labor cost, illustrative
- Research lead (Management Analyst)16 h
- Market & competitive analyst24 h
- Financial analyst12 h
- Technical writer / editor10 h
- Graphic designer6 h
- QA / fact-check reviewer6 h
- Project coordination4 h
AG Mosaic
~US$190
per research on the plans
Standard-depth report; overage US$247–251. Delivered per plan target.
≈25×
lower cost (US$4,813 vs US$190)
78 h → 1
analyst-hours become one order
Weeks → hours
target turnaround on the plans
Illustrative estimate for a report comparable to AG Mosaic's Standard-depth deliverable (~45–50 pages plus spreadsheet and brief). Hours are AG Mosaic's planning assumptions, not a guarantee; actual effort varies. Wages: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, OEWS May 2025 (national medians). AG Mosaic price: published plan rates; excludes taxes. Turnaround targets are goals, not SLAs. Sources: BLS OEWS, BLS ECEC.
Efficiency
78 h → 1 order
Efficacy
Every claim cited & verified
Effectiveness
Decision-ready stack in the formats teams actually use
Economy
~US$190 vs ~US$4.8K
Make your next decision with evidence.
Create an account in minutes, or talk to us about your team.